Showing posts with label change. Show all posts
Showing posts with label change. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 1, 2011

Prologue (3-5): Imprinting the Land

In Annie Dillard's Prologue to An American Childhood, she writes about what the land is and what it once was, tracing its genealogy back through the ages, where only woodpeckers and the occasional "gang of empty-headed turkeys" came through the quiet forests of Pennsylvania (4). She seems to take meaning for her own life from the land she inhabits, writing that "when [all] else has gone from [her] brain," including the faces of her family, "what will be left [...] is topology: the dreaming memory of land as it lay this way and that" (3). How does land touch us so--make us feel grounded, concrete, real? How is it, when we touch the earth, it reaches down inside us, grabbing onto some oft forgotten core? And how is it that despite all the changes the land sees, it still remains the same underneath the frantic rat race of life?

Dillard's passage inspired me to revisit the land with my own brood. Maybe something would leave an imprint. At the suggestion of Sydney's physical therapist, the uphill hike around Cress Creek gave direction to desire.

When we arrive, I close my eyes, blinking at the bright sun that glints against interpretive signs along the trail--signs imprinted with discoveries about the faulted land near my native Rexburg. Cress Creek tells the story of the land along the South Fork of the Snake River in Eastern Idaho. Cottonwood trees, some housing eagles' nests, surround the Snake, their leaves shaking with bright yellows and oranges in the late fall wind. Cattails rest in the low marsh. Along the trail, we learn that Indians used the land for food, trappers for pelts, and later settlers for homes and farmland that now expands across areas neighboring the Cottonwoods. At each subsequent age, the land has served a new need, but part of it always remains unchanged.

An old stagecoach trail intersects the same vision as distant, dormant volcanoes, volcanoes that once rained ash across the landscape. That same ash now composes a large portion of the rock along Cress Creek. Tuff, with its various fragments of fused detritus, tells a story entirely its own. Earlier than the Indians but sometime after volcanic eruptions, the creek comes running down the mountain. Sagebrush, Bitterbrush, Utah and Rocky Mountain Junipers arise from a seemingly dead environment to feed deer and other mountain animals. Watercress grows in the creek water, warmed by geothermal heat, and moose arrive to feed.

In the present, my kids run from post to post, searching for tracks, doo-doo, what Liam calls, "Blue's Clues" --anything that might denote an animal roamed across the same dirt. They identify some excrement along the trail as coyote scat, and I don't have the heart to tell them that it most likely came from a species of domestic dog: "Watch out; I think I just heard a coyote in the brush!" They scream and scatter.

My kids would have given their snacks, shoes, siblings to have glimpsed live animal inhabitants, an eagle, rabbit, lizard--anything. Wrong day? Wrong time? Should we have hiked with those trappers of old in order to make that stable and unchanging connection we're so eager to feel with the land? Like my children, I too long to visit some earlier time and place, be transported to experience June rhododendrons in early settled Pennsylvania, where Annie writes, "tall men and women lay exhausted in their cabins, sleeping in the sweetness, worn out from planting corn" (5). I have planted corn; I have slept, exhausted in my bed--but I would give something spectacular to smell those June flowers. We look to the land for comfort, but sometimes what we're searching for isn't there. The eagle passed at a different time of day. The flowers on Cress Creek faded in late summer. If the routines of my life don't organically intersect with settlers, summer, sweetness, I can close my eyes, wait nine months, two years, a half an hour--and suddenly the world is a new place with new possibilities. This is my latest discovery.

Wait for it. We close our eyes, and the world turns around again.

I've seen it happen over and over lately. Each day brings brilliant new surprises. Everything on the land changes for Dillard, from one space of time to the next. Yet across all those passages of time, there are connections, just as Dillard connects the spaces of time during her childhood into one vivid and amazing tapestry, a tapestry as brilliant as each of our own lives. One minute I'm tickling my kids before bed, the next I'm researching scholarly articles, shaking off single guys at LDS dances, responding to student grievances, planting corn. If only I could take a step back and view the marvelous pattern of it all--the landscape not of Cress Creek in the 1800s, 1925, or Pennsylvania in the 50's, but the landscape of my own life. It is the landscape, the topology, that gives meaning and purpose, guidance and direction to our lives. The tapestry, the topology, the hill's curves and juts, the winding river, the cattails in the low marsh, the "land as it lay this way and that."

Next week--Prologue (7-9): Play Me Some Soul Music

Friday, September 11, 2009

A New Name

"What's in a name? that which we call a rose,
By any other name would smell as sweet;
So Romeo would, were he not Romeo call'd..."
according to Juliet, anyway. Her simple words are enough to convince the star-crossed lover to exclaim, "Call me but love, and I'll be new baptiz'd; Henceforth I never will be Romeo" (II.ii.45-47, 53-54).

Ahh... if it were so easy. Are our names truly so insignificant? Would Juliet make the same argument mere days later when she became Juliet Capulet Montague, her name altered by that which she came so much to love? According to her previous reasoning, Juliet would be Juliet, regardless of Capulet, regardless of Montague, regardless of the alphabetical scribbles we take on that seem to define us. Could Romeo (the person) be anymore constant than Romeo (the name)?

I doubt the young Capulet knew that we shed skin cells like snakes. According to our own biology, by the time we are twenty years old, we will have replaced our skin cells nearly 200 times over (ASU, par. 10). So, by the time we are just coming to know ourselves, we have already worn 200 different skins. But do we ever really shed our souls? American author, Annie Dillard is always startled to rediscover the old self she had somehow forgotten. At every shocking realization she exclaims, "You again" (11).

At the end of living through hundreds of different skins, through seemingly hundreds of different lives, she notes:

Your very cells have been replaced, and so have most of your feelings--except for two, two that connect back as far as you can remember. One is the chilling sensation of lowering one foot into a hot bath. The other [...] when you feel the chill spread inside your shoulders, shoot down your arms and rise to your lips, and when you remember having felt this sensation from always, from when your mother lifted you down toward the bath and you curled up your legs: it is the dizzying overreal sensation of noticing that you are here. You feel life wipe your face like a big brush. (249)

I felt the broad brush stroke just last week, when the not-so-shocking realization came that my driver's license expired. Upon arriving at the Office of Motor Vehicles and handing the attendant my former driver's license, the woman curtly informed me that an impediment had been put on my record because of what else? My name. I needed my birth certificate. In Idaho, the court dictates what name you will be given--and they stick with birth names.

Rewind to that time when I was an infant, hurling downward into a baby's first bath. For nearly twenty-six years since then, my given name held true: Angela Heather McRae. Then, although I had already shed at least 200 different skins, I yearned for a new shape--to be called not just friend, sister, daughter, but wife. The updated social security card and Utah driver's license read Heather McRae Bosworth. Renewal. Why did I shed Angela, I ask myself now. Too long was probably the strongest argument--that and wanting to be defined by family, by history. Unlike fickle Juliet, we look for our names to define us. Still, I sat in shock at the DMV, greeting my long-lost self. Hello again, Angela. Where have you been the past seven years? I tilted my face upward. Swipe.

Romeo and Juliet got a lot wrong, even if you are part of that sickening romantic audience that believes they got one thing right. We cannot merely be who we have always been--without life's experiences marking us! Otherwise, what would be the point of life? We are composed of our given names and of more than our given names. We are made up of life. How else could Juliet exclaim, "Oh happy dagger!" (V.iii.169-170)? How else "happy" without the addition of Montague to her graphemic roll call? How else without first knowing and loving Romeo?

So, Juliet Capulet Montague was the same person and yet a changed person from just Juliet Capulet. Who, then, is this new person--this same person--on my driver's license? As I sat at Motor Vehicles, vacillating between the options of Angela H. McRae Bosworth, Angela Heather Bosworth, Angela H. M. Bosworth, I struggled to understand what happened to Heather McRae... and what happened to Heather Bosworth--without realizing, as I do now, that I am who I have always been, though changed. I settled with the office attendant for Angela Heather M. Bosworth (because anything longer wouldn't fit on the license), even though I still struggle to remember who Angela is. She's a vague, misty ghost--one that whispers memories of angels and another retired name: Sora McRae, who once lived in the Transylvanian countryside of Romania. Part of my consecrated mission as an eternal soul and as a human being, is living up to Angela, in ways too sacred to relate, if sometimes difficult to remember.

My latest trip to Motor Vehicles taught me that I
am still Angela, that I have always been Angela... but that (due to three angelic little creatures I grew inside this constantly shedding skin), I am also, and on some level always will be, Bosworth. Those two names, tacked onto opposite ends of my center, are no less relevant, no less a part of me. I am who I always have been; I am who I was at birth. I am. I remain. I persist. But my experiences shape me. I am member, teacher, spirit, daughter, cousin, niece, sister, mother, griever, guide.

As I legally drove back from the State offices last week, I couldn't help but gape at the expiration date on my new card: 2017?! Surely the world will end by then! And yet often life surprises us with the most unlikely occurrences. So, whether the world ends in eight years or not, I know this: the world will be a different place--and a vastly similar one. We embark and we arrive back home.



Works Cited

ASU. "Building Blocks of Life." Ask a Biologist. 14 Sept. 2009. 17 Sept

Dillard, Annie. An American Childhood. Harper & Row: New York, 1987.